Has anybody tried the default passive values for the SXA's?

The operation of transmitters designed to jam or block wireless communications is a violation of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"). See 47 U.S.C. Sections 301, 302a, 333. The Act prohibits any person from willfully or maliciously interfering with the radio communications of any station licensed or authorized under the Act or operated by the U.S. government. 47 U.S.C. Section 333. The manufacture, importation, sale or offer for sale, including advertising, of devices designed to block or jam wireless transmissions is prohibited. 47 U.S.C. Section 302a(b). Parties in violation of these provisions may be subject to the penalties set out in 47 U.S.C. Sections 501-510. Fines for a first offense can range as high as $11,000 for each violation or imprisonment for up to one year, and the device used may also be seized and forfeited to the U.S. government.

Moderators: adafruit_support_bill, adafruit

Has anybody tried the default passive values for the SXA's?

Postby powerpants » Mon May 26, 2008 9:24 pm

As has been discussed on this board before, some of the values of the components in the gain stage section are way different than those given on the application circuits on the SXA's datasheet, although the circuit topologies are pretty much the same.

Anybody know why this is, or tried using the "default values" given on the datasheet?
powerpants
 
Posts: 38
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 7:55 pm

rf

Postby inh » Tue May 27, 2008 2:45 am

in a word - impedance matching. If you look at the Sirenza datasheets, the Z pieces are stripline (0.54mm on 0.032" board, of a certain type). Unfortunately (at shorter wavelengths in particular) this stripline acts as an inductor (mainly) and so becomes part of the circuit. Ladyada's design does not conform to the appropriate Z lengths, which as you can see are expressed in wavelengths.

This is why RF design is described as magic. Unfortunately there are also issues such as solder fillet thickness, and constructive/destructive rf reflections going on at multiple places, which can only be measured accurately with a $40,000 network analyser.

So in the end - trial and error with a spectrum analyser on your unit is the best (cheapest) way to improve signal strength - I found slightly different values than Ladyada, but maybe that's because I used different soldering technique, or maybe I was focussing on slightly different fqs.

hope this helps.
thanks
Ian
inh
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 5:49 am
Location: london


Return to Wave Bubble

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Stuff to buy from the Adafruit store and links to product documentation!


New Products [102]

Raspberry Pi[80]
 
FLORA[23]
 
Bunnie Studios[9]
 
FPGA[1]
 
mbed[11]
Arduino[60]
 
NETduino[14]
 
BeagleBone[24]
 
Android[6]
 
XBee[10]
More Dev Boards[30]


 
BoArduino[8]
 
SpokePOV[4]
 
TV-B-Gone[4]
 
MiniPOV[3]
 
SIM reader[3]
 
Microtouch[5]
 
Clocks & Watches[18]
 
Drawdio[4]
 
Brain Machine[1]
 
Game of Life[2]
 
MintyBoost[2]
More DIY Kits[16]


 
MaKey MaKey[3]
 
Tweet-a-Watt[5]
 
Young Engineers[33]
 
Discover Electronics[2]
 
Snap Circuits[4]
 
littleBits[3]
 
Project packs[8]


 
Breakout Boards[33]
LCDs & Displays[48]
Components & Parts[69]
Batteries & Power[49]
EL Wire/Tape/Panel[52]
LEDs[109]
 
Wireless[14]
Cables[60]
 
Lasers[6]
Sensors/Parts[145]
 
Enclosures/Cases[11]
 
Solar[11]
 
RFID / NFC[13]
Prototyping[70]
 
iDevices[13]
Tools[71]
 
Wearables[39]
 
CNC[37]
 
Robotics[29]
 
3D printing[1]
 
Materials[24]


 
Stickers[41]
 
Skill badges[55]
 
Books[25]
 
Circuit Playground[7]
 
Gift Certificates[4]