this is fffffd up man the news messed this up for us

[scoopin]

http://cbs4.com/iteam/cell.phone.jammers.2.777946.html

[scoopin]

and that banned saying that banned about sexual predators would want this... where did that come from that banned what the f does this have to do with this? what so now anyone who has a jammer is a sexual predator. if i see that banned#@#*

[tbenefi33]

I read the link thank for posting.
That suck big time I better get to start working on mine now befor we can't do anything cause of these stupid noise news media people. I agree with scoopin what a total banned.

[jabe421]

Thank god for the I-Team, these devices should not ever be available to the public "for safety reasons". Well now that I think of it why not go a step farther and just ban cell phones "for safety reasons". I see a lot more people driving like idiots with cell phones plastered to their ears than sexual predators using jammers. Maybe we should ask Chris Hansen with Dateline NBC if he has ever had one of his sexual predators jam their systems up when they are doing the “To Catch a Predator” series.

[none_such]

@scoopin

A lot of these kinds of stories that are presented by the media are "ready-made" by the US government and no real journalistic research into why someone would want to build one was done. They serve to whip-up hysteria and confuse the issue. Maybe you remember the Valerie Plame Affair? That information was handed out practically as an already written story.