jps2000 wrote:A good approach is also to look into existing schematics and try to understand the function of each component.
Very much yes: Existing circuits are design problems that someone has already solved, so they're intellectually closed systems: there's at least one configuration where every part does exactly what the designer wanted. The dual processes of figuring out what the part does and why the designer wanted that specific behavior are incredibly instructive.
Equipment manuals from the 1960s through the 1980s are especially valuable. They go out of their way to explain the theory of operation and piece-by-piece operation of the circuits.. back then companies understood that users needed to understand the equipment to use it effectively. The Tektronix 'Concepts' manuals are some of the best technical documents ever written:
http://www.davmar.org/concepts.htmlPCB design is another, separate art. It begins with toplogy.. putting related parts close to each other so the traces are as short as possible, combining groups of parts into modules that talk to each other and routing signals between them in a reasonably sensible way.. and moves on to include as much low-level physics as the circuit demands. Cell phone PCBs are electrical components in their own right, with controlled impedances, matched trace lengths, and so on.
In general, circuits in the quasistatic domain (DC to about 10MHz.. where the physical circuit is much smaller than the wavelength of the fastest signal of interest) are less demanding than RF circuits. That's the easiest place to start learning.
And just as with circuit design, learning to read existing PCBs and relate them back to a schematic is hugely instructive. Along with "what does this component do?" and "why did the designer want that?", you can also ask "why put it here instead of somewhere else?"
You can think of schematics and physical circuits as two kinds of literature. It takes time to learn to read them, and more time to read enough that you start to recognize standard features, genres, and yes, fads. And as with every other kind of literature, you'll find masterpieces, day-to-day works that are competent but not much more, and the occasional piece of absolute garbage. All of them are worth reading, if only to remind yourself that you know better.