Frank_tt had issues with the kit supplied ZVP3306A which we know does not fully turn on and depending upon part variation, produce a flaky display on some clocks (we are just seeing a subset of kits sold posted here). I would expect it to produce lots of noise since it does not fully turn on and tends to oscillate a bit because of that. Oscillation appears to be evident on the scope measurements he included in the post. Following the same thread, the solution Frank_tt posted was to first turn around Q3 so it was installed backwards which caused the display issue he was having to go away but killed the battery. Then he ordered a ZVP2110A and put it in the correct way (matching boards silkscreen outline) and that also eliminated the display issues and did not kill the battery.
From my perspective, both you and Russell are looking at Q3 in a different way.
As you noted in the past your using a scope and looking for/at oscillations on a component that appears to cause voltage passing through the component to vary which I would think could if the oscillation dips low enough for a long enough period cause the VFD chip to be affected.
Scope photosRussell is looking for/at voltage input vs voltage output on a component with a standard meter to demonstrate how well a particular component passes voltage when it's base or gate is turned on via the clock circuit. The meter is a slow response averaging device and can only really see the average voltage at the point of measurement and so will not show any oscillations as a voltage change unless the time period of the oscillation is great enough for the meter to see. As the time period of the oscillations is short the meter will not see them. Application of the meter may also kill any oscillation present, thereby essentially eliminating it during the period of measurement.
The end result of both methods of testing/measurement is that the better more efficient the component is at passing voltage from input to output the less affect any voltage variations or oscillations will have on the function of the circuit downstream of the component. Your scope photos show that and Russell's voltage measurements also show that.
Personally, I like the ZVP2110A as a one part replacement as that seems to work for anyone who has tried it and their clock was not damaged in some other way. I also like the transistor/base resistor combo as it also works very well. Each component has advantages and disadvantages. A FET easy to damage with static during handling before install but costs less to implement and the transistor requires soldering base resistor to base lead which increases risk heat damage and costs a bit more to implement for the needed base resistor.